http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/simon-ors-vs-state-of-karnataka WebMar 27, 1996 · Nitin Anil Swargey (A-1) and his two friends, Ronny and Santu, A-2 and A-3 respectively, are residents of Bombay; A-1 and A-3 reside at Borivili, Bombay, whereas A-2 resides at Vasai, District Thane, Bombay. They went to Pune on 18-7-1992. There they contacted Tulsi Bhagwan Shetty (PW 46), a partner of Natraj Hotel for a room.

considered where the Court has imposed the Death Sentence.

WebState of Maharashtra IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal No. 1969 of 2009 Decided On: 13.09.2011 Ajitsingh Harnamsingh Gujral Vs. State of Maharashtra Hon'ble Judges: Markandey Katju and Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, JJ. Acts/Rules/Orders: WebSep 23, 2024 · The disputed lands are being built from time-to-time either for residential or industrial purposes. The Court held that as per Janu Chandra Waghmare v. State of Maharashtra [2] the “means and includes” definition of forest in Section 2(c-i) of the Private Forests Act does not weaken or take away from the primary meaning of the word ... uoft masters application

Case Law: Indian Hotel & Restaurant Association v. State of Maharashtra …

WebOct 12, 2024 · They referred to the case of Ronny v. State of Maharashtra (1998) where it was held that even if witnesses are brought by the investigating agency, they cannot be disbelieved on that ground. They further submitted that non-compliance of sec-100 (4) of CrPC can at the most be treated as defective investigation but cannot be completely … WebMar 22, 2006 · State of Maharashtra 1971 1 SCC 513...declaration which can be relied on as evidence must be made to a Magistrate and it has been further argued that in view of the … WebDec 14, 2001 · In a more recent case, namely, Ronny v. State of Maharashtra, 1998 (3) SCC 625, the above decision was referred to and distinguished and the raison d'etre for not … u of t masters in accounting