WebWatch on. Epistemology: 6. Analyzing Knowledge: 2. No-False-Lemma and No-Defeater Approaches. If we can’t analyze knowledge simply as justified true belief, can we add one more ingredient to produce a successful analysis? In this Wireless Philosophy video, Jennifer Nagel examines two ‘extra ingredient’ analyses of knowledge: Michael ... WebOn an optimistic version of realist moral epistemology, a significant range of ordinary moral beliefs, construed in realist terms, constitute knowledge—or at least some weaker positive epistemic status, such as epistemic justification. ... Notable candidate “debunkers” (i.e., defeaters) include the so-called “evolutionary debunking ...
JSTOR Home
WebDefeaters in current epistemology: introduction to the special issue. Luca Moretti & Tommaso Piazza. ... defeaters justification knowledge. DOI. 10.1007/s11229-017-1551 … Web24 The Place of Reasons in Epistemology 25 Reasons for Belief and Normativity 26 Epistemic Reasons, Evidence, and Defeaters 26.1 Introduction 26.2 Reasons, Their Weight, Justification, and Defeat 26.3. Defeat and the Durability of Knowledge 26.4 Luck, Defeat, and the Durability of Knowledge References Notes kim petras net worth 1994
"The Evolution of Defeaters: A Taxonomy" by Erica Nicolas
A defeater of a belief is evidence that this belief is false. Defeaters are of particular interest to epistemology because they affect whether a belief is justified. An important distinction is between undercutting and rebutting defeaters. Undercutting defeaters remove evidential support for a belief while rebutting defeaters provide evidential support for the opposite thesis of the belief. Defeaters play a central role in modern developments of defeasible reasoning. WebAug 28, 2024 · General Overviews. There are no textbooks or monographs devoted specifically to the topic of epistemic defeat, but the introduction to a special issue of … WebIn this Wireless Philosophy video, Geoff Pynn (Northern Illinois) introduces virtue epistemology, an approach to epistemology that takes intellectual virtue as the central concept in discussions of theory of knowledge. Along the way, he shows how virtue epistemology can provide interesting solutions to some of the problems that we’ve ... kim petras hit it from the back